Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
19-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

19-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022995 50.876376)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022924 50.876369,-1.022928 50.876383,-1.022938 50.876395,-1.022953 50.876405,-1.022973 50.876412,-1.022995 50.876414,-1.023017 50.876412,-1.023037 50.876406,-1.023052 50.876396,-1.023063 50.876384,-1.023067 50.876370,-1.023063 50.876356,-1.023054 50.876343,-1.023038 50.876333,-1.023018 50.876327,-1.022996 50.876324,-1.022974 50.876326,-1.022955 50.876332,-1.022939 50.876342,-1.022928 50.876355,-1.022924 50.876369)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL